Click Here



Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  :[ Q3Arena.com Message Board ]:   » The Lounge   » Questions about AMD XP processors

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Questions about AMD XP processors
TheKiller
Sarge
Member # 890

Member Rated:

posted 02-21-2002 07:09 PM     Profile for TheKiller   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I was told that the cores are different in the 1600, 1700, 1800s...
anyone know where the core changes?

--------------------


Talk is cheap, so is my signature.


Posts: 1723 | From: Gibsons, BC, Canada | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
DGhost
Sarge
Member # 2704

Member Rated:

posted 02-21-2002 09:04 PM     Profile for DGhost   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The new naming convention from AMD is only a marketing hype. Their speed are lower than the actual number of the CPU model that you have. This was to make competition harder with Intel because they've got "higher" speed but since the CPUs of AMD are more powerfull they thought that by making the consumer believe the name was the actual speed. Here's the real speed if you're talking about the real MHz:

Athlon XP cpu model Speed in MHz
1500 1.33ghz
1600 1.4ghz
1700 1.47ghz
1800 1.53ghz
1900 1.6ghz
2000 1.67ghz

--------------------

DGhost

"Everybody knows Rocket Launchers have proximity safety sensors that lockdown the firing mechanism to prevent point blank use, not my fault, stupid game."


Posts: 514 | From: Montreal | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
TheKiller
Sarge
Member # 890

Member Rated:

posted 02-21-2002 09:35 PM     Profile for TheKiller   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
So there is no design difference in the cores? That's my question...

--------------------


Talk is cheap, so is my signature.


Posts: 1723 | From: Gibsons, BC, Canada | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wowbagger
Sarge
Member # 2712

Member Rated:

posted 02-21-2002 09:54 PM     Profile for Wowbagger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
There are ALWAYS some differences in the cores...

However, they don't really change a thing for the user. It's like a P1-66 is totally different from a P1-133... but the internal structure is roughly the same and the instruction paths and optimizations are the same.

Don't worry, if there's a major difference between two components, the company will always try to put up a marketing stunt on that difference. (Twice as fast... with 256-bits pathways... MMX... SSE-2... IA-64... Xeon... With more than 15 (read 16) loop unfolding optimizations...)

It's the same as I used to say to my mom about power bars. If you want to protect your investment, simply look for power bars with insurance money on it. 2500$ will be a good bar. 5000$ a great one. 10000$ will never break 25000$ the small light will never flicker -- They will do marketing on everything that they can.

Have a nice day
Mike

[ 02-21-2002: Message edited by: Wowbagger ]


Posts: 87 | From: Montréal | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Redlemons
Sarge
Member # 70

posted 02-21-2002 10:03 PM     Profile for Redlemons   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Ack, everything seems to be bulls--t these days!

Change this site to Q3Arena.com XP Titanium Edition 2002+ and you're guaranteed more hits.


Posts: 1711 | From: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: Jun 1999  |  IP: Logged
DGhost
Sarge
Member # 2704

Member Rated:

posted 02-21-2002 10:49 PM     Profile for DGhost   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
yuck...

bite me

--------------------

DGhost

"Everybody knows Rocket Launchers have proximity safety sensors that lockdown the firing mechanism to prevent point blank use, not my fault, stupid game."


Posts: 514 | From: Montreal | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Lindi
Sarge
Member # 493

Member Rated:

posted 02-22-2002 02:56 AM     Profile for Lindi   Author's Homepage     Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hehe, I remeber back when the big AMD vs. Intel competition was just starting. Intel had just launched the "Pentium" processors... "Pentium" became a kinda hypeword instantly. I remeber stores selling machines with AMD processors, but called them "Pentiums" because it was such a cool word.

Kinda funny.


Posts: 3036 | From: Turku, Finland | Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged
Snag
Sarge
Member # 992

Member Rated:

posted 02-27-2002 02:03 AM     Profile for Snag   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
AMD was not a true player until the Athlon first came out to combat the higher end P2's and the up and coming P3's (seems wierd to say higher end P2 ) Before then with the Pentium the primary competition for Intel was Cyrix, who happened to be the first to introduce Performance ratings (anyone remember the Cyrix 166+ that was actually clocked at 150MHz...OOOOOHHH 16MHz difference hehe)
Posts: 2606 | From: Canada | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Q3Arena.Com

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04d